Congress 2.0

30 01 2009

[This post originally written for the Undercurrent blog, Make the Internet a Better Place]

President Obama is, undeniably, the first U.S. President of the digital age. Throughout his election campaign, Obama became a wildly popular participant in a wide range of social networks (from Twitter to YouTube, LinkedIn to Flickr; and, of course, on Facebook and MyBarackObama.com). By utilizing online technologies to reach out to citizens and to organize countless enthusiastic communities, Obama and his new media team amassed millions of supporters through conversation and interaction. By talking as well as listening to voters, Obama successfully opened up the lines of communication with citizens – people developed immense loyalty and support for the candidate who could seemingly empower and unite anyone, in a genuine and far-reaching way. Of course, this story is already old news because the technologically-savvy President is now in office. That is, the transition to a two-way administration that facilitates increased transparency has only just begun. Case in point: digital fireside chats (formerly located here, before Inauguration), The Citizen’s Briefing Book, and the first ever Presidential Blackberry.

What comes as more of a surprise, however, is the legislative branch’s own forays into new media tools. Beginning to break its closed shell of stodginess, Congress can be found tweeting under the Twitter usernames @HouseFloor and @SenateFloor

They may no @reply or follow others, however, it's definitely a new form of communicating Congressional activity.

They may not @reply or follow others - however, it's definitely a new form of communicating Congressional activity.

Perhaps even more exciting, Congress has been developing their commercial-free YouTube “hubs” for both the House of Representatives (HouseHub) as well as the Senate (SenateHub). These sites feature an interactive Google Map through which users are encouraged to “Discover, Connect, and Engage with [their] Government.” By clicking on a state, the map displays the links to that state’s Representatives’ or Senators’ YouTube channel (provided they have one). Though YouTube manages these hubs, each Congressperson’s office creates the original content for their individual channels – a huge step in the direction of a more transparent and open government.

In addition to clicking on the state, there is also a drop-down menu from which you can select your state.

In addition to clicking on the state, there is also a drop-down menu from which you can select your state.

In the video below, both the Democratic and Republican leaders of the House and Senate welcome citizens to check out Congress’s new home on the internet. Despite their differences, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi says, “one thing we can agree on is the importance of utilizing technology to communicate with constituents.” They welcome comments and response videos from citizens, thus encouraging people to directly access and communicate with their elected officials. In other words, instead of mass calling a Senator’s office, people can also create YouTube video responses. This ability has shifted into every internet user’s hands, along with the responsibility to find their representatives on YouTube and to keep tabs on their activity in Washington D.C. This “backstage pass to government” may be unprecedented, but it is certainly welcome.

Oh, and there’s also a new iPhone application called Town Hall that gives you information on all current or past members of Congress – it even gives Twitter Search results that display what people are tweeting about that representative. Now if only this application would also link to each Congressperson’s YouTube page…





YouLinkedInDeliciousFeedTube

13 01 2009

Sorry for my lack of posts – please blame my recent anxiety over the fact that I’M GRADUATING IN DECEMBER and my subsequent preoccupation with organizing my plans for the future. As I explained in my Winter Hibernation post, I’ve been working on bulking up (yes, even more) my social media involvement.  Despite my fondness for routines and reliability, I’ve decided to fully throw myself into new virtual-network-related routines.  There really is no turning back at this point, considering I plan to incorporate this Internet-enabled connectedness into my future career.

So far, my LinkedIn and Delicious accounts have proven useful.  While LinkedIn successfully connects me with coworkers and classmates, it also presents all of my professional information in one very accessible profile; I’ve also added the WordPress application that displays tidbits of my blog posts on my profile.  Pros to a regular resume?  The “websites” section, the customizable URL, the thorough scope of information, and the use of recommendations.  Some cons?  It has to match the paper resume perfectly, if submitted together.  I also think the site needs a nicer, slightly more personalized look; while it looks clean, LinkedIn should allow users to alter little details of their profile, such as font, bullet points, formatting/layout of the different sections.  As for Delicious, it serves as a simple, easy-to-reference log of the websites/articles that I read and share on Twitter – whereas my tweets will eventually disappear from my profile, I can always look back at my Delicious bookmarks.

With Aditi‘s help and encouragement, I’ve finally put together a much more complete RSS feed that’ll keep me updated on news, pop culture, technology, and social media sites, in addition to my friendsawesome blogs.  Oh, the pain and excitement of committing to new networks.

An old, but now active profile? My YouTube page.  I think I’ll actually post videos this time around, what with my new MacBook and Blackberry.  (Don’t worry, 12seconds, I still adore you.)  See my semi-ridiculous debut video – featuring me, Meghna, and the crazy squirrel in Princeton- below:

To wrap up this post, here are other things I’m watching/loving this week:

  • the Palm Pre!! I want it. And as much as I love my Blackberry, I want this phone more. And they’re releasing it on Sprint (my carrier) as well, sigh. Perhaps in a couple years when they come out with a newer-and-more-improved version.
  • Kate Winslet’s Golden Globe acceptance speech for Best Actress in a Drama.  Classy and quirky simultaneously.  In response to her speech, I wonder why she isn’t married to Leo.  Then again, her husband (Sam Mendes, American Beauty, Revolutionary Road) is an amazing director and the father of her children.
  • Since September, there have been YouTube “hubs” for the U.S. Senate and the House of Representatives.  Displaying a U.S. map, the sites connect to each Congress member’s YouTube channel (which is actually, for the most part, applicable).  Hadn’t heard about it until now, but I think it’s about time.  Now to see how the Obama administration makes government spending available to taxpayers online – website + Twitter?




My Internship’s Better Than Yours

10 07 2008

Not only do I get to learn the ins and outs of social media at Undercurrent, but I also get to be part of our office dance party, broadcast live (on our website) every Friday at 3:45pm EST. Yeah, it’s the next big thing.

For your viewing pleasure…

(^I’m pretty much hiding from the camera until 2:30 and on, ha.)

(Note our office Hug Me Pillow & the post-it wall art of Mr. T, created by our own Jake Bronstein.)

And, of course, what kind of digital think tank would we be if we didn’t make those dance party videos available on our very own YouTube channel? It comes with a bonus “Jesus Does Soulja Boy” video (Oh Lord, literally).





“We’re Friends on Facebook”

7 07 2008

The internet eliminates time and space restrictions a la Marshall McLuhan‘s assertion that “the medium is the message.” That is, the nature of the internet – the medium/technology itself – is to connect people in real time from any wired place in the world. It therefore changes the actual pace of people’s everyday lives while expanding their sense of place across/within digital communities.

Since beginning my internship at Undercurrent, I’ve become more and more involved in the digital world of social media (exhibit A: this blog). Working on developing my own “personal brand” has been exciting – I mean, it’s great putting my own personality and thoughts online everyday for my various digital networks to see (and hopefully respond to). Throughout my recent dive into the waters of TwitterStumbleUponDiggYouTubeVimeoBlogsBlogsBlogsRSSFlickrTechnoratiCompeteGoogle, I’ve been trying to flesh out my own thoughts on the impact of social media. Most of what I’ve read emphasizes its immediacy, its connectedness, its community – well, it emphasizes the fact that social media is digital, and not face-to-face, communication.

But how exactly do social media relationships translate into face-to-face interactions? Chris Brogan suggested that people’s web presences and profiles be incorporated into real-world meetings, so as to make conversation and networking easier. Like Brogan, I don’t think the digital social world and real social world should be considered mutually exclusive. But when it comes to my own internet Friends/Followers/Diggers/Subscribers/etc., would they actually want to meet me in “real life?”

I believe interacting with people across both the digital and real worlds can result in various relationship dynamics – more in-depth, more awkward, somewhat complicated, quite up-to-date, and so on – depending on the amount of face-to-face interaction you’ve had, before or after you “friended” each other. Based on my own experiences, here’s a list of what it’s like to “take your relationship to the next level” (whether from digital–>reality or reality–>digital).

Facebook

“Hey, we’re friends on Facebook.” I heard someone use this line to introduce herself to a stranger at Gallatin Orientation a couple weeks ago. At that moment, freshman year came back to haunt me. Your Facebook friends aren’t always your friends in real life. And when you are eager enough to friend people you don’t know before actually meeting them, it sets up a wonderfully awkward situation for when you meet face-to-face for the first time. Now I only Facebook friend people I know, i.e. reality–>digital relationships, please.

Twitter

Twitter followers who may/may not know each other + setting up in-person gatherings = Tweet-ups. Pretty cool if you’re the kind of person who’s up for it. I haven’t tried it out yet.

Myspace

Maybe it’s because Myspace is “so two years ago” and reminds me of my early awkward teenage years, but a lot of my Myspace friends were strangers whom I’d never think to actually meet in person. After all the media attention and my personal experience with inappropriate messages from strangers, I pretty much associate the network with potential stalkers and creepers. Then again, some people find their significant others via Myspace, so who knows?

YouTube

When I watch people on YouTube videos, I don’t expect to meet them in real life, ever. Considering all their popularity online, I do wonder what LisaNova and HappySlip would be like in person.

I’m sure I’ve left some loose ends in my thought process. Help me out with your ideas?

Update: I just saw this BBC article on Digg questioning if social networking sites pose a “mental risk” to teenagers born in the 90s.