InSTEDD Interview Recap

14 05 2009

Sorry for not updating in a while. Last week I was busy finishing up the semester and moving back to NJ, and now I’m preparing to move to DC this weekend. With my downtime at home, I’ve been finalizing this ICT for Disaster Response project and writing up my DigiActive post on InSTEDD’s Mekong Collaboration Program. Which reminds me, I have yet to blog about my experience with interviewing InSTEDD’s team members.

So close to submitting the post for review!

So close to submitting the post for review!

Two Sundays ago, I Skype-chatted with Ed Jezierski (VP of Engineering) and Shannon Oliver (Director of Communication, Mekong Region) for about an hour each. Ed had recently flown to Seattle from InSTEDD’s center in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, whereas Shannon was still stationed in the region. I spoke with Ed first, whose technological expertise provided a detailed explanation of how InSTEDD uses its collaboration tools (GeoChat, Mesh4X, Evolve). The bandwidth in Cambodia wasn’t cooperating at first, so Shannon and I had to wait a few hours before reconnecting (Ed said the slow connection presents an everyday problem to communication between team members). When we were finally able to connect, Shannon presented a thorough overview of InSTEDD’s background, mission, and projects in the Mekong region; he helped me understand the recent successes of the organization and nicely complemented what I had learned from Ed. Both men were very enthusiastic about answering my questions and I felt like I came away with a lot of information (read: I recorded over two hours of conversation). They thanked me for the interview and encouraged me to Skype them if I had further questions.

I’ve spent the past couple days listening to the two interviews and jotting down important features to discuss. I just finished the draft of my DigiActive post an hour or so ago. Though it seemed pretty daunting to synthesize all the interview information into a blog post, I somehow managed to do so (not gonna lie, the post is rather long). Given all of the success InSTEDD has had with its innovative technology, I’m glad I have the opportunity to give their work more much-deserved attention (no pressure, right?). I’ll link to my post once it’s up on DigiActive’s site :)

UPDATE: The post is up, you can read it here.





Overview: InSTEDD

20 04 2009

InSTEDD = Innovative Support To Emergencies Diseases and Disasters

“The InSTEDD Platform: Collaboration Technology for Humanitarian Action and Global Development” via Slideshare

This is a presentation created by InSTEDD’s Chief Technology Officer, Robert Kickpatrick, about their 3-part collaboration technology suite for humanitarian response to global health emergencies.  If all goes well (which I think it will!), I should be interviewing InSTEDD team members this week for a Digiactive.org post on key aspects of their Mekong Collaboration Program.  The presentation above gives a great overview of their platform and tools. Read the rest of this entry »





“Natural” Disaster or Not, Response is Key

20 04 2009

While browsing my Netvibes tab, I came across a post from Development Gateway’s Disaster community about the contested definition of a “natural” disaster.  On the one hand, consider the UN’s definition: “the consequences of events triggered by natural hazards that overwhelm local response capacity and seriously affect the social and economic development of a region.”  On the other hand, humanitarian activists question whether natural disasters are indeed “natural” in the sense that they occur without provocation – an “act of God,” as it were.  In a world of human-induced global warming and climate change, the number of natural disasters (hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, etc.) worldwide is rising accordingly.

This same debate comes into play with disasters that occur as a result of human intervention (or lack thereof).  As with the recent “mini tsunami”/dam collapse in Indonesia, many local bloggers are demanding the government be held accountable for its negligence and poor maintenance of the Situ Gintung dike.  Though the dike was built almost 80 years ago by the Dutch colonial government, people still lived in the surrounding dangerous area.  When it burst (after people reported leaks for some time), it destroyed hundreds of nearby homes and took approximately one hundred lives.  After the jump: one of the videos embedded in the very informative Global Voices article; shows one village after this tragedy.

Read the rest of this entry »