L’Aquila Earthquake: From Online to On-the-Ground Response

13 04 2009

About this time last week, a 6.3 magnitude earthquake struck L’Aquila, Italy, killing approximately 281 people in the region and injuring over 1000 others.  With towns and homes destroyed, estimates of the number of displaced and homeless are upwards of 20,000.

via Breaking Tweets: #earthquake (Posted by @Buonaiuto in LAqulila, Italy)

via Breaking Tweets: "#earthquake" (Posted by @Buonaiuto in L'Aqulila, Italy)

As we’ve seen the immediacy of social networks like Twitter and Flickr in reporting past disasters (e.g. the earthquake in California this past summer, the Mumbai terrorist attacks, the airplane crashes in NY), local Italians were the first to break the news of the earthquake (or, #terremoto & #italy hashtags) via Twitter. Twitter user, @danybus1, tweeted about waking up to the earthquake. Much thanks to Global Voices bloggers for aggregating such great responses.

Twitter user @danybus1, tweeted about waking up to the earthquake. Much thanks to Global Voices bloggers for aggregating such great responses.

The following tweet reads (again, thanks Global Voices): "Awaken by the earthquake, look up immediately info on twitter (and I find them)"

Not only did Twitter help spread the word of the disaster in the hours following its initial destruction, but over 500 Facebook groups were created during this critical time, in which people offered their volunteer efforts, their homes for  victims, and their support.  It isn’t clear from the Global Voices post whether any of these people indeed secured housing for earthquake victims to live in, but Facebook was definitely used as a medium to help coordinate citizen action.

On the relief organization front, Télécoms Sans Frontières (TSF) reported on its blog that it had deployed a response team by April 6th.  TSF (or, “Telecoms Without Borders”) is a French organization with other offices in Nicaragua and Thailand.  Priding themselves on being “deployable anywhere around the world,” TSF specializes in rapid disaster response by establishing ICT hubs in the worst affected areas. Through these hubs, they help connect victims with their family members in the country and abroad.

The TSF team set up mobile networks as well as camps in the Abruzzo region (of which L’Aquila is the capital city). They further assist search/rescue teams by providing access to broadband Internet and phones via mobile “satellite-based terminals.”  And, since many homeless/displaced victims still have their mobile phones with them, TSF set up a generator in the largest shelter (Paganica) to allow people to charge their phones.

Not only did online communities like Twitter enable citizens to report the disaster, but this immediate reaction helped effect rapid response to an urgent situation.  In that ICT means quicker newscasting, it also synchronizes quicker coordination and subsequent action by humanitarian organizations and dispersed individuals.  Because of this ability,  ICT tools will become increasingly integral to disaster response campaigns.

As I work to become more well versed in this area, many of my next blog posts will look at established groups like TSF (“In the past 10 years TSF has deployed to 11 earthquakes world wide”) and analyze the effectiveness of their work in saving innocent lives.

P.S. I’d love to hear any feedback you, my dear readers, might have about this new direction for my blog.  Are you interested in the use of ICT for humanitarian relief?  The role of social media in responding to disasters?





Digital Update (or, why I’m better on Twitter)

25 01 2009

Last week was pretty standard for the first week of classes.  Along with my in-class introduction – “Hi, I’m Nina and I’m a first-semester senior in Gallatin, originally from NJ…” – I also developed the usual anxiety over adapting to a new schedule while frantically searching amazon.com for used/cheaper textbooks.  Of course, what was not usual (um, unusual) about last week was the Presidential Inauguration of Barack Obama.  I watched the oath/Inaugural Speech in the student center on a huge screen and later listened to the parade via CNN/Facebook’s livestream (imagine hearing crowds cheering in the background as you’re working).

Despite the busy week and the fact that I should be reviewing Supreme Court cases, I’ll attempt to list the news I’m currently excited about.  If this bullet format seems like a trend of mine, you can attribute it to my love for Twitter – which happens to fit my scattered thoughts perfectly.  As I’ve said before, Twitter is always the best place to see what I’m doing/thinking (also known as virtually lurking me – it’s okay, that’s kind of the point).

  • In addition to CNN/Facebook’s livestream and feed of Facebook updates, Microsoft Photosynth was taking people’s 2D photos of the event and overlapping each picture’s unique perspective to create a 3D experience. Last spring, a speaker came to my Anthropology of Media course and actually demonstrated this technology – he showed us how thousands of individual tourists’ photos of Notre Dame could be “stitched together” in a way that allows people to explore popular destinations from their computer.  From what I remember, you can click on any single layer (representing an individual photo) and the program will show you the exact position from which the picture was taken (i.e. where the photographer was standing).
  • The Undercurrent Social Island(TM) is in full effect, as Julia put it the other day. We’re avid socializers and self-proclaimed digital ninjas (hii-yah!):
Ana and Sean, Julia took the photo. I'm hunched over, writing something down.

Also in this pic: Ana and Sean, Julia took the photo. I'm hunched over, writing something down.

Sorry for the rushed post.  Until next week.





Facebook Facelift

24 07 2008

I now have the new Facebook design. I’d first heard about the anticipated changes a couple months ago and decided not to worry about the transition until it actually happened. Well it’s been happening now for the past couple days and I finally saw the design in person when Julia (my boss) got it on Monday. My own Facebook layout suddenly switched on me last night when I was preparing to blog about it. Talk about good timing. And I might’ve shrieked like a little girl when the page unexpectedly refreshed to the new look – because I’m a dork.

Here are some changes that I’ve noticed so far:

  • The layout is wider
  • The profile is sectioned and separated by tabs – Wall, Info, Photos, and Boxes
  • You can add your favorite application(s) as additional tabs
  • There’s a mysterious blank box underneath the profile picture that says, “write something about yourself” – the About Me box is now moved, i guess?
  • You can directly edit on your profile without having to navigate to a different page
  • The Friends box displays all of your friends, not just your main network. AND you can pick how many friends appear in the box (6, 9, 12) as well as who permanently stays in that box. MySpace, much?
  • “The Publisher” is basically the Mini-feed integrated with the Wall, so that your statuses, photos, and comments are all displayed in the Wall tab. You can also edit the SIZE of each item, so as to control which stick out more.
  • You can either leave new comments on other people’s Walls or comment on their existing activities/photos/statuses

Click here or here for more info. If you want to try out the new design yourself, go to http://www.new.facebook.com and see what happens.





Google Me

12 07 2008

When I type my name into Google, I get about 3-4 pages of results, comprised of my various social media networks and an old high school accomplishment here and there. While I’m aware that the act of “Googling myself” probably stems from a mixture of narcissism and curiosity, it’s satisfying to see how my internet presence has grown since I began interning with Undercurrent. And, considering my last name is so unique, I am actually the only person (aside from my big-time lawyer uncle in Thailand) who shows up in the search results.

On the one hand, I’m excited that my name and thoughts are search-able and could potentially have influence on someone (anyone?). That, and I kind of welcome the attention – I’m an only child, after all. On the other hand, I’m hesitant to release my personal information all over the Google-able (not a word) web. Maybe it’s because I’m not used to my new stalkable level. Or maybe it’s because I’m realizing how I’m not only building up my personal-brand-and-social-media-networking self, but I’m also whittling away at my personal privacy. I mean, now that my full name is in several digital places, it’s really easy for anyone to find me on Facebook via Stumbleupon or Digg or Mashable or Twitter (or vice versa). Or, anyone can find my one embarrassing YouTube video that I created for the Cubby Bernstein campaign – yeah, we’re not going to talk about it.

Sure, I’m not used to all of this quite yet. But when the world(-wide-web) is becoming increasingly more monitored/surveilled (read: Obama Drama!) and you can’t leave a comment on any website/blog without being prompted to give “your own url,” I’d rather have my name and ideas out there. So go ahead and Google me, or yourself, for that matter.





“We’re Friends on Facebook”

7 07 2008

The internet eliminates time and space restrictions a la Marshall McLuhan‘s assertion that “the medium is the message.” That is, the nature of the internet – the medium/technology itself – is to connect people in real time from any wired place in the world. It therefore changes the actual pace of people’s everyday lives while expanding their sense of place across/within digital communities.

Since beginning my internship at Undercurrent, I’ve become more and more involved in the digital world of social media (exhibit A: this blog). Working on developing my own “personal brand” has been exciting – I mean, it’s great putting my own personality and thoughts online everyday for my various digital networks to see (and hopefully respond to). Throughout my recent dive into the waters of TwitterStumbleUponDiggYouTubeVimeoBlogsBlogsBlogsRSSFlickrTechnoratiCompeteGoogle, I’ve been trying to flesh out my own thoughts on the impact of social media. Most of what I’ve read emphasizes its immediacy, its connectedness, its community – well, it emphasizes the fact that social media is digital, and not face-to-face, communication.

But how exactly do social media relationships translate into face-to-face interactions? Chris Brogan suggested that people’s web presences and profiles be incorporated into real-world meetings, so as to make conversation and networking easier. Like Brogan, I don’t think the digital social world and real social world should be considered mutually exclusive. But when it comes to my own internet Friends/Followers/Diggers/Subscribers/etc., would they actually want to meet me in “real life?”

I believe interacting with people across both the digital and real worlds can result in various relationship dynamics – more in-depth, more awkward, somewhat complicated, quite up-to-date, and so on – depending on the amount of face-to-face interaction you’ve had, before or after you “friended” each other. Based on my own experiences, here’s a list of what it’s like to “take your relationship to the next level” (whether from digital–>reality or reality–>digital).

Facebook

“Hey, we’re friends on Facebook.” I heard someone use this line to introduce herself to a stranger at Gallatin Orientation a couple weeks ago. At that moment, freshman year came back to haunt me. Your Facebook friends aren’t always your friends in real life. And when you are eager enough to friend people you don’t know before actually meeting them, it sets up a wonderfully awkward situation for when you meet face-to-face for the first time. Now I only Facebook friend people I know, i.e. reality–>digital relationships, please.

Twitter

Twitter followers who may/may not know each other + setting up in-person gatherings = Tweet-ups. Pretty cool if you’re the kind of person who’s up for it. I haven’t tried it out yet.

Myspace

Maybe it’s because Myspace is “so two years ago” and reminds me of my early awkward teenage years, but a lot of my Myspace friends were strangers whom I’d never think to actually meet in person. After all the media attention and my personal experience with inappropriate messages from strangers, I pretty much associate the network with potential stalkers and creepers. Then again, some people find their significant others via Myspace, so who knows?

YouTube

When I watch people on YouTube videos, I don’t expect to meet them in real life, ever. Considering all their popularity online, I do wonder what LisaNova and HappySlip would be like in person.

I’m sure I’ve left some loose ends in my thought process. Help me out with your ideas?

Update: I just saw this BBC article on Digg questioning if social networking sites pose a “mental risk” to teenagers born in the 90s.